The Network Operations Board (NOB) oversees the day-to-day operations of the Exchange Network. The mission of the NOB is to establish and maintain operational policies and guidance; manage shared services and infrastructure; manage data standards and format development; manage the development and implementation of Network web services and data exchanges; expeditiously, impartially, and judiciously resolve all Network Partner implementation and operational issues; and elevate issues to the Exchange Network Leadership Council as appropriate.
To ensure that the NOB draws upon the expertise of a wide range of Partners, its membership consists of EPA and State Co-Chairs and representatives from EPA, States, and Tribes.
NOB Members
- Connie Dwyer (EPA Co-Chair)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
202.566.1691
dwyer.connie [at] epa.gov
- Roy Walker (State Co-Chair)
Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality
405.702.7188
roy.walker [at] deq.ok.gov
- Mike Beaulac
Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
517.241.7808
beaulacm [at] michigan.gov
- Glen Carr
Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
503.229.5062
carr.glen [at] deq.state.or.us
- Frank Harjo
Muscogee (Creek) Nation
918.549.2510
fharjo [at] muscogeenation-nsn.gov
- John Harman
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
202.566.0748
harman.john [at] epa.gov
- Jonathan Jacobson
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
202.566.1984
jacobson.jonathan [at] epa.gov
- Bruce Jones
Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission
360.528.4369
bjones [at] nwifc.org
- Carol O’Tormey
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency – Region 3
215.814.2677
otormey.carol [at] epa.gov
- Lucy Reed
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
202.564.5036
reed.lucy [at] epa.gov
- Chris Simmers
New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services
603.271.2961
chris.simmers [at] oit.nh.gov
- Joe Wilson
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
202.564.2867
wilson.joe [at] epa.gov
NOB Calls and Meetings
Upcoming
- January 17, 2012
- February 14, 2012
- March 13, 2012
- April 10, 2012
- May 8, 2012
- June 5, 2012
- July 3, 2012
- July 31, 2012
- August 28, 2012
- September 25, 2012
- October 23, 2012
- November 20, 2012
- December 18, 2012
Summaries
- December 6, 2011
- September 27, 2011
- August 30, 2011
- August 2, 2011
- June 2, 2011
- March 29, 2011
- February 15, 2011
- December 7-8, 2010
- November 18, 2010
- September 21, 2010
- August 10, 2010
- July 20, 2010
- June 29, 2010
- May 25-26, 2010
- May 18, 2010
- March 16, 2010
- February 23, 2010
- February 2, 2010
- January 12, 2010
- December 1, 2009
- October 28-29, 2009
- October 20, 2009
- September 22, 2009
- August 18, 2009
- July 28, 2009
- July 7, 2009
- May 26, 2009
- May 5, 2009
- April 1, 2009
- February 10, 2009
- January 13, 2009
- December 16, 2008
- October 28, 2008
- October 7, 2008
- September 16, 2008
- August 26, 2008
- August 12, 2008
- July 15, 2008
- June 24, 2008
- May 20, 2008
- April 22, 2008
- April 1, 2008
- March 12-13, 2008
- February 19, 2008
- January 29, 2008
- January 8, 2008
- December 4-5, 2007
- November 6, 2007
- October 23, 2007
- September 25-26, 2007
- September 4, 2007
- August 14, 2007
- July 23, 2007
- July 2, 2007
- June 12, 2007
- May 15, 2007
- April 10, 2007
- March 14-15, 2007
- February 27, 2007
- February 6, 2007
- January 16, 2007
NOB Documents
- Charter of the Exchange Network Leadership Council and the Network Operations Board
- NOB Operating Procedures
- NOB Policy on Guidance Document Format and Submission
- Charter of the Network Technology Group and the Network Partnership and Resources Group
NOB Operating Procedures
The NOB uses the following guidelines when making decisions during member absences:
- At least one Co-Chair must be present at every Board call or meeting and for each decision made by the Board.
- The NOB can make decisions even if not all participants are present, provided that a quorum is met and at least one NOB Co-Chair is present.
- The Co-Chairs may designate other members of the Board as acting Co-Chairs. The Board will not accept proxy members from outside of the Board.
If the NOB members feel that additional technical expertise is required to provide input or background information for a call or meeting, they can choose to invite appropriate experts.
NOB Decision Memoranda
The NOB will use Network Decision Memoranda to formalize all decisions. Eventually, many of these memoranda will be incorporated into broader Exchange Network guidance documents.
All Network Decision Memoranda will be released to the Network community through Network Alerts. The decisions reflected in the Memoranda are effective upon their release.
2006-01: Exchange Network XML Namespaces (Revised 3/31/2006)
2005-03: Valid Literal Representations, Use, and Interpretation of XML Schema Boolean Type Elements (Revised 3/31/2006)
2005-02: Shared Schema Component Usage
2005-01: Parameter Encoding for Query and Solicit Methods
NOB Decision-making Procedures
The NOB will set aside a length of time at each call or meeting to review new issues and discuss documents submitted for NOB review. If an issue is pressing or considered to be non-controversial, however, the NOB Co-chairs can submit it to the full NOB for consideration via e-mail (known as the expedited decision-making process). These traditional and expedited decision-making processes are defined as follows:
- Traditional: A specified block of time for discussing issues and deciding resolution paths for those issues will be set aside at each NOB call or meeting. A quorum of six is needed (with two State and two EPA members present and a Co-chair in attendance), and a majority of those present must approve of the decision.
- Expedited: Decisions on resolution paths for issues are made via e-mail, with a minimum of a 72-hour review period. At least 6 NOB members must assent, with no members dissenting; at least two of the assenting members must be State members, and two must be EPA members. Any issue being vetted via the expedited decision-making process must include a proposed solution. The proposal cannot be amended via e-mail; should any amendments be proposed, the NOB should move the issue to the traditional decision-making process. Any member of the NOB can request that an issue be moved to the traditional decision-making process at any time.